Didn't Google release a study recently that said SMART was pretty much ineffective?

Also see this bit from Bill's notes: "Overall, from his [Luiz'] experience, he feels that SMART is inadequate to predict drive failures. It might be useful, though, in predicting population-wide trends."

I was going to say the same thing as Adam – SMART is nearly worthless. That standard was created without first doing proper feature discovery to figure out what kind of data would actually be useful in predicting mechanical drive failures.

storagemojo.com/?p=378